Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-organized, actionable design-phase workflow with a concrete document template, explicit persistence contract, and a properly gated threat-matrix reference. It is efficient and clearly sequenced, with only minor conciseness and validation-loop gaps.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient and assumes Claude's competence, with a focused design template and tight rules; minor boilerplate repetition (e.g., persistence contract restated across steps) could be trimmed. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides a concrete, copy-paste-ready design document template, explicit file paths, persistence topic keys, and a return-envelope format; minor gaps come from references to shared docs not bundled here. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear five-step sequence with a mandatory persistence checkpoint, applicability-gated threat matrix, and explicit blocking-question handling; lacks a formal validate->fix->retry loop but gates progression well. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-structured body with a single one-level-deep reference (references/threat-matrix.md, confirmed to exist) that is clearly signaled and conditionally loaded; minor organization gaps from reliance on external shared docs. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |