Content
57%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, actionable SDD design-phase executor with a clear numbered workflow and good progressive disclosure via a single real conditional reference. It is held back by redundancy around the threat matrix, delegation of core persistence mechanics to an external shared file, and the absence of an output-validation checkpoint before return.
Suggestions
Add an explicit pre-return verification step (e.g., confirm the design addresses every proposal requirement and persistence succeeded) to close the output-validation gap and lift workflow clarity.
Inline the essential retrieval/persistence contract or a minimal concrete example of it so the skill is executable without relying solely on skills/_shared/sdd-phase-common.md.
Consolidate the threat-matrix guidance to a single authoritative statement plus a pointer, removing the triple repetition to improve token efficiency.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly efficient and domain-specific with no basic-concept padding, but the threat-matrix requirement is stated three times (Step 2a, the format template, and Rules) and the orchestrator-gate/executor-override boilerplate could be tightened, matching the level-2 anchor of mostly-efficient-but-could-tighten rather than the every-token-earns-its-place level 3. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Concrete numbered steps, explicit paths, a copy-paste design-doc template, and explicit artifact keys are present, but the core retrieval/persistence mechanics are delegated to external skills/_shared/sdd-phase-common.md (Sections A-D) with no inline detail and no worked example, fitting level 2's concrete-but-incomplete anchor. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Steps are clearly sequenced (1-5) with some explicit checkpoints (MANDATORY persistence, 800-word size budget, threat-matrix applicability marking), but there is no checkpoint verifying the produced design is complete/correct before return and no error-recovery feedback loop, leaving output validation implicit per the level-2 anchor. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | A clear overview with well-organized sections and a verified one-level-deep reference (references/threat-matrix.md, confirmed present) that is conditionally loaded and clearly signaled, with no nested references, matching the level-3 anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 9 / 12 Passed |