Conciseness

The body is tight and project-specific with no over-explanation of concepts Claude already knows (it never explains what a registry or .gitignore is), but the command "gentle-ai skill-registry refresh --cwd <project>" and the Engram keys ("topic_key: skill-registry", "capture_prompt: false") each appear twice — once in Hard Rules and again in Execution Steps — which is minor redundancy that could be trimmed, placing it just below anchor 5's "every token earns its place".

Actionability

Fully executable, copy-paste-ready guidance throughout: the exact command with flags ("gentle-ai skill-registry refresh --cwd <project>" plus "--force"), the exact output path ".atl/skill-registry.md", exact persistence parameters ("title: skill-registry", "topic_key: skill-registry", "type: config", "capture_prompt: false"), and a concrete Decision Gates table — matching anchor 5's "fully executable; copy-paste ready code or commands".

Workflow Clarity

The five execution steps are clearly sequenced with explicit validation checkpoints and error-recovery branches — "If it reports the refresh was skipped (not a project), stop", "If it fails, report the error instead of scanning by hand", and the availability-gated manual-scan fallback in step 2 — matching anchor 5's explicit validation steps and error-recovery handling rather than anchor 4's 'minor validation gaps'.

Progressive Disclosure

Good structure with well-labeled sections and a clearly signaled, one-level-deep References section where each entry carries a one-line description. The minor gap: the referenced paths ("docs/skill-style-guide.md", "skills/_shared/skill-resolver.md") are not present in the skill bundle (no references/, scripts/, or assets/ files ship alongside SKILL.md), so navigation cannot be verified to resolve — one step below anchor 5's "easy navigation".

Specificity

The 'what' clause "Index available skills by trigger and path" names the domain and one concrete action with two organizing dimensions, matching anchor 3 ("Names domain and 1-2 concrete actions, but not comprehensive") rather than anchor 4, since it does not list several specific actions like the persist-to-Engram, dedup, or manual-scan behaviors the body actually performs.

Completeness

Both parts are explicit and concrete: 'what' is "Index available skills by trigger and path" and 'when' is the explicit trigger clause "Trigger: update skills, skill registry, actualizar skills, after skill changes", fitting anchor 5's "clearly and explicitly answers both what AND when with concrete trigger phrases". It exceeds anchor 4 because the 'when' is fully explicit, not weakly implied.

Trigger Term Quality

Natural phrases a user would say are present — "update skills", "skill registry", "after skill changes" — plus a synonym variant "actualizar skills", giving good coverage. It stops short of anchor 5 because common natural terms for the other activating operations (install, remove, create, move, rename, refresh) are missing.

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

"skill registry" carves a clear niche with distinct triggers, but "update skills" and "after skill changes" could minorly overlap with skill-authoring/editing skills, matching anchor 4's "mostly distinct; minor overlap risk with closely related skills" rather than anchor 5's minimal conflict risk.