Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a tight, well-structured operational guide: rules, a verification checklist, good/bad split examples, a sequenced PR workflow, and useful commands, with no filler or background padding. Its weaknesses are minor — some repetition of the tests-with-code rule, a couple of abstract checklist items, and no explicit recovery path when the checklist fails.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense with lean tables, checklists, and commands rather than padded explanation, but "Keep tests with code" is repeated across Critical Rules, the Checklist, Split Examples, and the PR Relationship section, so minor trimming is possible. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete weak-vs-better split examples, an explicit pre-commit checklist, and executable git commands give mostly actionable guidance; a few items like "Tell a story" remain abstract without operationalizing how to verify it. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The PR Relationship section gives a clear numbered sequence with a size-based promotion checkpoint ("If the PR approaches 400 changed lines") and the checklist acts as a pre-commit validation, but there is no explicit feedback loop telling the reader what to do when a checklist item fails. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist and all content appropriately lives in a compact single file with well-labeled sections (When to Use, Critical Rules, Checklist, Split Examples, PR Relationship, ODD Relationship, Commands), making navigation easy with nothing that should be split out. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |