Content
85%Weight 40%Scale 1-3Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a tight, well-structured instruction skill with concrete tool invocations, explicit thresholds, and a clear daily workflow. Its only weakness is minor redundancy that keeps conciseness from a perfect score.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient — tables and terse bullets assume Claude's competence and avoid explaining known concepts — but a few lines restate information (e.g., 'Every API call costs money' restates the intro) and could be tightened. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides a concrete tools table, specific invocation examples like decide_activity(activity="work", reasoning="..."), explicit numeric thresholds, and iteration guidance ('submit by iteration 10–12 out of 15'). | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The daily workflow is clearly sequenced (Analyse → Decide → Execute → Stop) for a simple single-purpose process; no destructive/batch operations are present that would require validation checkpoints. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | A single self-contained file under 50 lines with well-organized sections and no need for external references, which the rubric permits to score 3 on progressive disclosure. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |