Content
85%Weight 40%Scale 1-3Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A highly actionable, well-structured eval skill with concrete code, explicit validation loops, and clean reference splitting. The main weakness is organizational redundancy that inflates length without adding new information.
Suggestions
Consolidate the repeated max_turns guidance (currently in Core Principles, Section 5, Section 7, and Common Pitfalls) into a single authoritative spot and cross-reference it.
Merge the 'do not abandon long tasks' advice, which appears both in Section 5 ('keep polling... do not abandon a run after the first long pause') and Common Pitfalls, into one location.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | It avoids explaining concepts Claude already knows, but repeats guidance across sections (max_turns lowering warnings in Core Principles, Section 5, Section 7, and Common Pitfalls; 'do not abandon long tasks' stated twice), so it could be tightened rather than earning a lean 3. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides executable bash (git clone, exports, apt-get, srt --version), real Python snippets (sandbox settings, engine/collect pattern), concrete test-file paths, and per-scenario success criteria that are largely copy-paste ready. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear 7-step sequence with explicit validation checkpoints (sandbox smoke check, assertion examples), a failure-classification feedback loop ('classify before changing code'), and a feature coverage checklist. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Heavy code templates and the feature matrix are split into real, one-level-deep reference files (test-patterns.md, feature-matrix.md) that are clearly signaled both inline and in a dedicated Additional Resources section. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |