fallback-file-creation

Fallback pattern for reliable file creation when code execution tools fail

Quality

70%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

Securityby

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./benchmarks/gdpval/skills/fallback-file-creation/SKILL.md

Quality

Content

81%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is a strong, highly actionable workflow with explicit verification and a debugging feedback loop, scoring top marks on actionability and workflow clarity. Its main weakness is mild verbosity from the duplicated PDF/DOCX examples, which keeps conciseness at the midpoint.

Suggestions

Consolidate the PDF and DOCX examples into one worked example plus a short 'Other formats' note listing the conversion command variant, to reduce token redundancy.

Trim self-evident commentary such as 'This ensures you're creating files in the correct workspace directory' and 'Avoid relying on `.` or implicit paths' where the command already conveys the intent.

If the skill grows, move the troubleshooting table and format-specific conversion commands into a references/ file signaled from the body to improve progressive disclosure.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Conciseness	The body is mostly efficient, but the PDF and DOCX examples near-duplicate the same pwd/ls/create/execute/verify pattern, and a few lines over-explain what Claude already knows ('This ensures you're creating files in the correct workspace directory'); consolidating to one example with a format-variants note would tighten it.	3 / 5
Actionability	Fully executable, copy-paste-ready shell commands throughout: heredoc script creation with explicit escaping rules, chmod +x, and concrete verification commands (pdfinfo, unzip -l, file, head -c); two worked examples cover the common PDF and DOCX cases with real paths.	5 / 5
Workflow Clarity	A clearly sequenced five-step process with an explicit verification checkpoint (Step 4: Verify Output) and a feedback loop (Step 5: Iterative Debugging), plus a best-practices checklist and a troubleshooting table for error recovery.	5 / 5
Progressive Disclosure	No bundle files exist; content is a single well-organized file with clear sections (When to Use, Steps, Examples, Best Practices, Troubleshooting). Structure is good, but the two near-identical examples could be consolidated and there is minor organization redundancy, so it sits at 4 rather than 5.	4 / 5
	Total	17 / 20 Passed

Description

58%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description answers both what and when, but in somewhat abstract terms that under-specify the concrete formats (PDF, DOCX) the skill actually handles and the natural trigger phrases a user would say. It is competent but leaves distinctiveness and trigger-term quality underdeveloped.

Suggestions

Add concrete file formats to the description, e.g. 'Create PDF, DOCX, and other document files via shell scripts' to lift specificity and trigger-term coverage.

Include a 'Use when...' clause with natural user phrasing such as 'Use when code execution tools repeatedly fail to create a file, or when the user asks to generate a PDF or DOCX directly via shell commands.'

Name the specific tools referenced (execute_code_sandbox, shell_agent) in the trigger to reduce overlap with general file-creation skills.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Specificity	Names the domain ('file creation') and one concrete action ('reliable file creation' via a fallback pattern), but coverage is not comprehensive; it stops short of naming specific formats like PDF/DOCX that the body actually supports.	3 / 5
Completeness	It states both what it does ('reliable file creation' fallback pattern) and when to use it ('when code execution tools fail'); the 'when' is explicit but could be more specific about which tools or failure modes, fitting the 4 anchor rather than 5.	4 / 5
Trigger Term Quality	Includes relevant keywords ('file creation', 'code execution tools fail') but misses the natural phrases and synonyms users would actually say ('create a PDF', 'create a document', file extensions); the 'when' phrasing reads as technical rather than user-spoken.	3 / 5
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk	The fallback niche ('when code execution tools fail') gives some distinctiveness, but 'file creation' is very broad and would overlap with many file-generation skills; not clearly a separate niche.	3 / 5
	Total	13 / 20 Passed

Validation

100%

Warnings & errors only

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository: HKUDS/OpenSpace
Path: benchmarks/gdpval/skills/fallback-file-creation/SKILL.md
Commit: 3827781

Reviewed: 22 days ago

Table of Contents

Discovery Implementation Validation

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.