Content
70%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The skill is well-structured, executable, and includes explicit verification, scoring well on workflow clarity and progressive disclosure. Its main weaknesses are minor verbosity from redundant trigger sections and an incomplete multi-step example that references an undefined variable.
Suggestions
Define `data` (or replace it with an inline literal) in the multi-step example so the snippet is fully runnable as written.
Replace the bare `except: pass` with explicit error handling so the example models the 'Error handling' best practice it recommends.
Merge the overlapping 'When to Use' and 'When to Fall Back to This Pattern' sections to remove redundancy and trim tokens.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly efficient with executable snippets and no explanation of basic concepts, but the near-duplicate 'When to Use' and 'When to Fall Back to This Pattern' sections and a `try/except: pass` antipattern add padding that could be tightened. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | The primary heredoc examples are concrete and copy-paste ready, but the multi-step example references an undefined `data` variable and uses a bare `except: pass`, leaving a key detail incomplete. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | There is a clear sequence (try sandbox, fall back to run_shell, then verify) with an explicit verification step and retry guidance, which fits a simple single-purpose skill well. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | This is a single-purpose skill under ~120 lines with no bundle files and well-organized sections (When to Use, Workaround Pattern, Best Practices, Verification, Limitations) and no nested references. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |