Multi-stage fallback strategy for PDF/document extraction using sequential tool alternatives
53
58%
Does it follow best practices?
Run evals on this skill
Adds up to 20 points to the overall score
View guide
Low
Low-risk findings worth noting
Fix and improve this skill with Tessl
tessl review fix ./benchmarks/gdpval/skills/pdf-extraction-fallback/SKILL.mdLow
Low-risk findings.
1 low severity finding. Worth noting, but not necessarily harmful.
The skill exposes the agent to untrusted, user-generated content from public third-party sources, creating a risk of indirect prompt injection. This includes browsing arbitrary URLs, reading social media posts or forum comments, and analyzing content from unknown websites.
The required workflow in SKILL.md is document text extraction from PDFs supplied to the skill (e.g., via PyPDF2/pypdf, pdftotext, pdfplumber/pdfminer, or OCR), so the extracted contents could be outsider-authored PDF text that becomes LLM-readable context; no restriction is described that the PDF is operating-user authored.
c5a9c4b
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.