reliable-pdf-extraction
Use shell commands or Python libraries to extract PDF text when read_file PDF handler fails
57
64%
Does it follow best practices?
Run evals on this skill
Adds up to 20 points to the overall score
View guide
Low
Low-risk findings worth noting
Fix and improve this skill with Tessl
tessl review fix ./benchmarks/gdpval/skills/reliable-pdf-extraction/SKILL.mdLow
Low-risk findings.
1 low severity finding. Worth noting, but not necessarily harmful.
W011: Third-party content exposure detected (indirect prompt injection risk).
What this means
The skill exposes the agent to untrusted, user-generated content from public third-party sources, creating a risk of indirect prompt injection. This includes browsing arbitrary URLs, reading social media posts or forum comments, and analyzing content from unknown websites.
Why it was flagged
The required workflow reads a user-supplied PDF (via `run_shell` calling `pdftotext` / `pdfinfo` or via `execute_code_sandbox` running PyMuPDF/pdfplumber), and the extracted PDF body text (outsider-authored content if the PDF came from someone else) is then placed into `result.stdout`/printed output and thus into the agent’s LLM context—indirect prompt injection risk.
- Repository
- HKUDS/OpenSpace
- Commit
c5a9c4b
- Audited
- Security analysis
Is this your skill?
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.