CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

remember

Review auto-memory entries and propose promotions to OPENSPACE.md, OPENSPACE.local.md, or retained auto-memory topics; detect duplicates, stale facts, conflicts, and ambiguous entries before making changes.

61

Quality

71%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./openspace/skills/remember/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The content is a well-structured, concise instruction-only skill with a clear sequenced workflow and validation checkpoints via success criteria. It would benefit from slightly tighter prose and a concrete output template for the final report.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is efficient and assumes Claude's competence, with no concept over-explanation; the repeated 'Success criteria' lines and some table prose could be trimmed slightly.

4 / 5

Actionability

Concrete guidance is given via specific filenames, a decision table with examples, and a structured report format; as an advisory review skill it lacks executable commands but the instruction-level guidance is actionable.

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

A clear four-step sequence is present with per-step success-criteria checkpoints and an explicit approval gate in Rules; there is no error-recovery feedback loop, but the task is non-destructive (proposals only).

4 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

The skill is self-contained with well-organized sections (Goal, Steps, Rules) and no external references needed; the simple-skill exception applies as content is clear and appropriately structured.

5 / 5

Total

17

/

20

Passed

Description

63%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description clearly and comprehensively states what the skill does, but omits any explicit 'when to use it' trigger guidance, capping completeness and trigger-term quality. It is otherwise specific and reasonably distinct.

Suggestions

Add an explicit trigger clause, e.g. 'Use when the user asks to review, clean up, or reorganize their memory, or mentions auto-memory, OPENSPACE.md, or memory duplicates/conflicts.'

Include natural user-facing synonyms such as 'memory cleanup', 'memory review', and 'memory audit' to improve trigger-term coverage.

Name the trigger contexts more concretely (e.g. 'when memory grows stale or duplicated across sessions') to sharpen distinctiveness.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists multiple concrete actions — 'Review auto-memory entries and propose promotions', 'detect duplicates, stale facts, conflicts, and ambiguous entries' — with comprehensive coverage of what the skill does.

5 / 5

Completeness

The 'what' is clear and concrete, but there is no 'Use when...' clause or equivalent explicit trigger guidance, which caps completeness at 3 per the rubric guidelines.

3 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Contains relevant keywords ('auto-memory', 'OPENSPACE.md', 'duplicates', 'conflicts') but misses the natural phrases a user would say ('review my memory', 'clean up memory') and lacks synonyms.

3 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The niche focus on auto-memory review plus specific filenames (OPENSPACE.md, OPENSPACE.local.md) makes it mostly distinct with minor overlap risk; absent explicit triggers keep it below 5.

4 / 5

Total

15

/

20

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
HKUDS/OpenSpace
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.