Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is a well-structured, concise instruction-only skill with a clear sequenced workflow and validation checkpoints via success criteria. It would benefit from slightly tighter prose and a concrete output template for the final report.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is efficient and assumes Claude's competence, with no concept over-explanation; the repeated 'Success criteria' lines and some table prose could be trimmed slightly. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete guidance is given via specific filenames, a decision table with examples, and a structured report format; as an advisory review skill it lacks executable commands but the instruction-level guidance is actionable. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear four-step sequence is present with per-step success-criteria checkpoints and an explicit approval gate in Rules; there is no error-recovery feedback loop, but the task is non-destructive (proposals only). | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is self-contained with well-organized sections (Goal, Steps, Rules) and no external references needed; the simple-skill exception applies as content is clear and appropriately structured. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |