Content
72%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-organized, mostly lean instruction skill with concrete delegation examples and useful do/don't anti-patterns. Its main weakness is workflow clarity: batch/destructive examples are presented without explicit validation or feedback checkpoints, which caps that dimension despite the otherwise clear structure.
Suggestions
Add an explicit validation/feedback step for batch and destructive examples (e.g., after 'Update all configuration files', instruct to verify each file still parses and re-delegate fixes if any fail).
Show the literal shell_agent invocation syntax in at least one example instead of only describing the delegation in prose, to close the actionability gap.
Trim the redundant Summary and the 'The shell_agent will:' numbered list, which restate content already covered, to tighten conciseness.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly lean with short lists and concrete prompt examples, but the closing Summary and the numbered 'The shell_agent will:' block restate known behavior and could be trimmed; fits 'efficient with minor over-explanation'; not 5 due to that redundant restating, not 3 because padding is minor. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete, copy-paste-ready task descriptions ('Create a comprehensive SOAP note file...', 'Update all configuration files... timeout: 300') and do/don't anti-patterns give actionable guidance for the delegation paradigm; not 5 because the actual shell_agent invocation syntax is never shown (only described), leaving a minor gap. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Although this is a single-action delegation skill, the batch example ('Update all configuration files in the config/ directory') and the error-recovery framing involve destructive/batch operations with no explicit validation or verify-then-fix checkpoint, triggering the cap-at-3 rule; not 4 because the validation cap takes precedence, not 2 because structure and sequence are clearly present. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A compact, single-purpose skill with no bundle files and well-organized sections (Purpose, When to Use, How to Use, Best Practices, Comparison, Anti-Patterns, Summary) fits the simple-skill exception for a top score; not 4 because there are no organization gaps to dock it. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |