Content
57%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A dense, domain-rich skill with genuinely non-obvious reference data and mostly executable code. Its weaknesses are the absence of an explicit step-by-step workflow and the monolithic placement of ~220 lines of material in SKILL.md with no progressive disclosure into reference files.
Suggestions
Add an explicit numbered workflow near the top (e.g., 1. Fetch prices/FX via yfinance → 2. Compute AH and ADR premiums → 3. Evaluate z-score signal → 4. Assess delisting risk → 5. Render the output template) to make the sequence procedural rather than implied.
Move the ADR conversion-ratio table and the delisting-risk/HFCAA framework into a references/ file (e.g., references/ratios.md, references/delisting-risk.md) and link them from SKILL.md to enable progressive disclosure.
Tighten the Overview and 'Structural drivers' prose to cut explanatory padding, and replace the vague AH Premium Index note with a concrete command or API call.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient: the content is dense tables, formulas, and code rather than prose, and much of it is domain data Claude cannot be assumed to know (ADR conversion ratios, ticker pairs, HFCAA framework). However, the Overview paragraph restates the description, and sections like 'Structural drivers of AH premium' and 'ADR premium drivers' include explanatory reasoning that could be tightened. Not a 4 because the padding is more than minor. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides executable Python functions (calculate_ah_premium, calculate_adr_premium), copy-paste yfinance fetch calls, a z-score signal script, and a concrete output template. Minor gaps keep it below 5: the AH Premium Index access note ('use Hang Seng website or Tushare') gives no concrete command, and delisting_risk_factors is a data sketch rather than runnable logic. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | There is an implied sequence (fetch data → compute premiums → interpret signal → assess delisting risk → produce the output format), but no explicit ordered workflow; the organization is conceptual (Core Concepts, Data Access, Output Format) rather than procedural. The Output Format template partially compensates, but checkpoints and an explicit step sequence are missing — matching the 'steps present but implicit' anchor rather than the 'clear sequence with most checkpoints' anchor. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body has clear section headers and is self-contained (no broken or nested references), but at ~220 lines it inlines reference material — the ADR ratio table, the delisting risk framework, and the worked strategy examples — that would fit better in separate reference files under references/. No bundle files exist, so everything sits in SKILL.md; structure is present but the split is not, matching the 'some structure but could be better organized' anchor. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 13 / 20 Passed |