CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

bottleneck-hunter

Supply-chain bottleneck arbitrage. Given a super-trend (AI infra, energy transition, defense, semiconductor reshoring, space economy), decompose its physical supply chain down to Layer 2/3 choke points (optics, lasers, InP/SOI substrates, IC substrates, probe cards, specialty fiberglass...) and surface under-the-radar listed companies sitting on each bottleneck. Scores each link on 6 scarcity criteria, applies mandatory valuation gates (PS/PE/safety-margin) via the financial_rigor tool, and Munger-style reverse-validates. Outputs a ranked bottleneck opportunity board. Use when the user wants hidden beneficiaries of a structural trend rather than already-priced leaders.

72

Quality

90%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Low

Low-risk findings worth noting

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

88%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A well-structured, highly actionable multi-step research workflow with strong validation gates; its only weakness is mild verbosity and inlined material that could live in separate reference files.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is dense and mostly lean — tabular criteria, thresholds, and tool commands rather than explanations of concepts Claude already knows — but the intro reframes the methodology at some length and the AI-infrastructure layer dump is long, so a few sections could be tightened.

4 / 5

Actionability

Highly executable: concrete scarcity thresholds (≤3 suppliers, >2y lead time, >90% utilization), explicit tool invocations ('financial_rigor command=verify_valuation', 'command=three_scenario', 'report_audit command=extract → verdict'), valuation gate cutoffs (PS>30x, PE>80x), search-query templates, and a copy-ready output one-pager template.

5 / 5

Workflow Clarity

Seven clearly sequenced steps with explicit validation checkpoints — the mandatory valuation gate in Step 4, the positive+reverse cross-validation in Step 5, and the 'report_audit extract → verify each point → verdict' quality gate in Step 6 — provide feedback loops for a research/batch workflow.

5 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

Well-organized into clearly headed sections (Steps 1–7, bias self-check, core principles) and self-contained with no nested references, but at ~180 lines some material (the full layer-decomposition example, the output template) could be split into reference files rather than inlined.

4 / 5

Total

18

/

20

Passed

Description

92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A strong, specific description that clearly states both capabilities and trigger conditions, with only minor room to broaden the natural-language trigger vocabulary.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists multiple concrete actions — 'decompose its physical supply chain down to Layer 2/3 choke points', 'surface under-the-radar listed companies', 'Scores each link on 6 scarcity criteria', 'applies mandatory valuation gates (PS/PE/safety-margin)', 'Munger-style reverse-validates', 'Outputs a ranked bottleneck opportunity board' — giving comprehensive coverage.

5 / 5

Completeness

Explicitly answers both 'what' (decompose, score, valuation-gate, reverse-validate, output a ranked board) and 'when' ('Use when the user wants hidden beneficiaries of a structural trend rather than already-priced leaders') with a concrete trigger phrase.

5 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

The 'Use when the user wants hidden beneficiaries of a structural trend rather than already-priced leaders' clause supplies natural trigger phrasing, but the surrounding vocabulary ('choke points', 'Munger-style reverse-validates') is domain-jargon heavy and omits some plainer synonyms a user might say.

4 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Occupies a clear niche (supply-chain bottleneck arbitrage for investment research) with a distinct trigger that is unlikely to fire for unrelated skills.

5 / 5

Total

19

/

20

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository
HKUDS/Vibe-Trading
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.