Content
82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-organized, highly actionable body with executable code and a clear processing pipeline, supported by real one-level-deep reference files. Minor conciseness and organization refinements (moving the bulk signal-function table to a reference) would push it to the top level.
Suggestions
Move the full 43-function / 15-row signal-function table into a references file (e.g. references/信号函数.md) and keep only the top 3-4 in SKILL.md to improve progressive disclosure.
Tighten '实现方式' and the data-format table, which restate library behavior Claude can infer from docs.
Add an explicit verification step after analysis (e.g. check that c.bi_list is non-empty / expected笔 count) to strengthen workflow checkpoints.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient with sectioned tables and a focused quick-start, but '实现方式' and some descriptive prose (e.g. the data-format table) restate things Claude could infer, leaving minor instances that could be trimmed. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Copy-paste ready executable code (RawBar construction, CZSC instantiation, accessing bi_list/bars_ubi), a pip install command, and a concrete table of named signal functions cover the common cases fully. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The core pipeline '原始K线 → 去包含处理 → 分型识别 → 笔检测 → 中枢构建 → 买卖点判定' gives a clear sequence and the quick-start is concrete, but there are no explicit validation/checkpoint steps; this is an analysis skill (non-destructive) so the destructive-cap does not apply. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-structured overview with one-level-deep references (核心概念/分型.md, 买卖点/一买一卖.md, etc.), all of which resolve to real bundle files; the inline signal-function table is borderline bulk that could live in a reference, keeping it just short of a 5. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |