Content
50%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is well-structured and domain-rich with concrete formulas and thresholds, but it carries some basic concept teaching, an incomplete code stub, and no validation checkpoints or progressive file split.
Suggestions
Trim or compress the '核心要素' basics table to avoid teaching concepts Claude already knows.
Replace the ConvertibleBondEngine.generate `pass` stub with executable logic, or explicitly justify it as a skeleton.
Add a validation/re-check step to the 轮动 and 双低 selection workflows (e.g., verify 评级 and 剩余期限 filters before ranking).
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly efficient with formulas and tables, but the '可转债基础概念/核心要素' section explains basics (面值=100元, 票面利率递增) that Claude already knows, adding some unnecessary context. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | It provides executable code (bond_floor) and concrete thresholds (双低值<130, 转债价格<115, 溢价率<30%), but the ConvertibleBondEngine.generate method is a `pass` stub rather than complete executable code. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The 轮动流程 and selection steps are numbered, but batch selection/screening operations lack explicit validation checkpoints, capping workflow clarity at 2 per the guidelines. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is a single ~260-line monolithic file with no bundle files in references/scripts/assets; it is section-organized but all content is inline with no one-level-deep references to split out detail. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 8 / 12 Passed |