Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is a well-structured, information-dense router reference with concrete tools, env keys, symbol formats, and validation/fallback guidance. It is consistently strong across dimensions, with only minor room to tighten redundancy and deepen the decision-tree executability.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense reference material with no concept padding and assumes Claude's competence, but the Source Overview and Source priority sections have minor redundancy that could be tightened. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete tool names, env keys, and copy-paste symbol-format examples are highly actionable, though the decision-tree steps remain somewhat high-level rather than fully executable. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The decision tree is clearly sequenced with validation checkpoints (report missing keys, cross-check sources, throttle-to-fallback feedback); minor gaps keep it below a 5. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A single self-contained file with well-organized, navigable sections and no nested references, but the large inline source table could arguably be split into a reference file. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |