Content
57%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is well-organized and rich with concrete thresholds and formulas, but workflows lack explicit validation checkpoints and the analytical steps are formulas rather than runnable code. Trimming inline reference tables and adding validate/verify steps would lift the weaker dimensions.
Suggestions
Add explicit validation checkpoints to the筛选 and FOF workflows (e.g. after ranking, verify data completeness and cross-check 风格漂移 before proceeding).
Provide at least minimal executable Python for the core computations (Sharpe, 回归风格箱, 跟踪误差) rather than only mathematical formulas.
Move the inline ETF fee/comparison reference table and full FOF allocation recipes into a separate reference file to reduce body length while keeping the overview.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Content is dense and largely fluff-free with formula/threshold tables earning their tokens, but it inlines substantial reference material (full ETF fee comparison, complete FOF allocation recipes) that Claude largely knows and could be trimmed or externalized, fitting the 'mostly efficient but could be tightened' anchor rather than the lean anchor at 3. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides concrete formulas, named indices with codes (e.g. 399346), explicit thresholds, and a copy-ready report template, but the analysis steps are expressed as statistical formulas/regressions rather than executable Python, so it is concrete yet incomplete rather than fully copy-paste ready. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The five-step筛选法 and four-step FOF construction are clearly numbered with checkboxes and monitoring rules, but there are no validation/checkpoint steps for batch ranking or rebalancing operations, so per the rubric workflow_clarity is capped at 2 for missing feedback loops. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is a self-contained, well-sectioned reference (核心概念 / 分析框架 / 输出格式 / 注意事项) with no bundle files present and no deeply nested references; per the scoring notes a self-contained skill without need for external references can score 3 when clearly organized. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 9 / 12 Passed |