Content
63%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body delivers highly actionable, well-sequenced analytical methodology with concrete formulas and thresholds, but it is a monolithic inline document with time-sensitive examples and no progressive disclosure to separate reference files.
Suggestions
Move time-sensitive data (ETF sizes, the specific worked fund example with manager/date/scale) into a separate references file or a clearly marked '示例（时点数据，需更新）' section to avoid penalizing conciseness.
Split the metric reference tables and ETF comparison into one-level-deep reference files (e.g. references/metrics.md, references/etf-comparison.md) linked from SKILL.md to improve progressive disclosure.
Add an explicit validate→fix→retry checkpoint in the screening workflow (e.g. re-run style regression when R² < 0.8 before accepting a fund) to push workflow clarity toward the top anchor.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense, mostly lean reference data (formulas, thresholds, index codes) assuming Claude's competence, but it inlines time-sensitive figures (e.g. ETF '规模 800亿+', the worked example '张坤 任职 2018-01-05...规模450亿') outside any deprecated section, which the rubric penalizes. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete, specific guidance throughout — exact formulas, '优秀阈值' cutoffs, a regression specification for style analysis, and a gated five-step screening framework — giving actionable direction despite the near-absence of runnable code (acceptable for an instruction skill). | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Multi-step processes are clearly sequenced with checklist gating (Step 1–5 fund screening, Step 1–4 FOF construction with rebalancing and 监控预警 triggers), with only minor validation gaps and no explicit validate→fix→retry feedback loop. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Section structure is clear (概述/核心概念/分析框架/输出格式/注意事项/依赖), but no bundle files exist and substantial reference material (metric tables, ETF comparison, output template) is inlined in a single ~270-line SKILL.md rather than split into one-level-deep references. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 14 / 20 Passed |