Content
65%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A rich, actionable reference with executable data-access code and concrete thresholds, but it is a monolithic single file with implicit validation checkpoints and inline reference material that could be extracted.
Suggestions
Move the Tushare/yfinance API column details and the AH-premium reference into a separate references/ file, linking from the body to improve progressive disclosure.
Add an explicit validation/sanity-check step to the workflow (e.g. cross-check that the composite signal's NB flow sign matches the 20-day cumulative figure before reporting).
Trim the explanatory 'why this matters' prose and consolidate the Notes section to reduce repetition and tighten conciseness.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient domain-specific signal frameworks, but includes explanatory prose (e.g. 'Foreign institutions... are considered smart money', '~4-5% of free-float... marginal price-setters') and a notes section that restates concepts, so it could be tightened. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides fully executable, copy-paste-ready code — real Tushare calls (pro.moneyflow_hsgt, pro.hsgt_top10) with documented columns, yfinance downloads, and a concrete output template with an example composite-score table. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear conceptual sequence (architecture → NB → SB → AH premium → composite → data access → output → notes) and a structured output template exist, but there are no explicit validation/sanity-check checkpoints and the composite-score assembly is left implicit. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized into headed sections, but it is a single ~240-line monolithic file with no bundle references and substantial API-reference detail (Tushare/yfinance columns) inline that could be split into a separate reference file. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 9 / 12 Passed |