Content
67%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is a dense, actionable reference with concrete examples, formulas, and a structured per-strategy framework. Its main gaps are some redundant explanation of basic concepts and a monolithic single-file structure that could offload detail to reference files.
Suggestions
Trim or remove the Greek-meaning tables and the 'intrinsic + time value' preamble, which restate concepts Claude already knows.
Move SABR calibration detail and market-making infrastructure into separate reference files (e.g. references/SABR.md, references/market-making.md) and link to them from the overview.
Add an explicit end-to-end workflow with validation checkpoints (e.g. surface check → strategy selection → position sizing → risk-limit verification) to strengthen workflow clarity.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly efficient with domain-specific detail, but re-explains concepts Claude already knows (e.g. 'option price = intrinsic value + time value', Greek-meaning tables for Delta/Vega/Theta, and what a volatility surface is) that could be tightened. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | It provides concrete worked trades with numbers (50ETF C2800 IV=18%), formulas (Zakamouline hedge trigger, Gamma-scalp PnL), SABR parameter ranges, and an output template, but the 'code blocks' are parameter specs and examples rather than copy-paste runnable scripts. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Each strategy follows a clear principle → entry conditions → example → risk-control sequence with checkpoints like stop-loss thresholds and position limits, though there are no explicit validate→fix→retry feedback loops. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The file is well-organized with clear section headers and tables, but all content is inlined in a single ~180-line document with no bundle/reference files for material (SABR calibration detail, market-making infrastructure) that could be split out. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |