Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is highly actionable with complete, copy-paste-ready templates and mapping tables for all three platforms, and its workflows are clearly sequenced with a verification checklist. Its main weaknesses are that the large per-platform reference material is inlined in one file rather than split into reference files, and validation is a final checklist rather than an integrated feedback loop.
Suggestions
Move the per-platform reference blocks (Pine/TDX/MQL5 mapping tables and templates) into separate reference files (e.g. references/pine.md, references/tdx.md, references/mql5.md) and keep SKILL.md as an overview with one-level-deep links.
Add an inline validation checkpoint inside the export workflow — e.g. after translating, verify entry/exit conditions match the Python signal logic across all platforms before write_file — with a fix-and-retry loop.
Trim the symbol-format and limitations tables or move them into a reference file to tighten conciseness.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense reference material (mapping tables, templates, syntax rules) with almost no padding of concepts Claude already knows, though it is long and carries some redundancy (symbol-format and limitations tables). Matches anchor 4 (efficient; minor instances that could be trimmed); not 5 because the inlined bulk and minor redundancy mean not every token is maximally earned. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | It provides copy-paste-ready templates for all three platforms (Pine `//@version=6` strategy header, TDX formula with assignment/color syntax, MQL5 OnInit/OnCalculate with SetIndexBuffer) plus complete Python→target function mapping tables with exact names. Matches anchor 5 (fully executable; copy-paste ready; common cases covered); the placeholder markers are appropriate scaffolding, not pseudocode. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Two clearly numbered workflows (export-from-backtest, generate-from-description) are given with read_file/write_file commands, and a Quality Checklist provides verification, but validation is a detached final gate rather than inline checkpoints with feedback loops. Matches anchor 4 (clear sequence with most checkpoints; minor validation gaps); not 5 because there is no integrated validate→fix→retry loop within the workflow steps. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist, so all ~300 lines of per-platform mapping tables and templates are inlined in a single SKILL.md well over 50 lines, which the simple-skill exception does not cover. Matches anchor 3 (some structure but content that should be separate is inline); the section headers are well organized, which keeps it from 2, but the bulk reference belongs in separate files to reach 4-5. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |