Content
50%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A rich, well-organized regulatory reference with concrete checklists and a worked report template, but it is a long monolithic file with pseudocode backtest snippets and time-sensitive dates scattered inline rather than isolated.
Suggestions
Move per-market rule detail (A股/港股/美股/加密) into separate reference files under references/ and keep SKILL.md as a concise overview pointing one level deep, which would also improve progressive_disclosure.
Consolidate time-sensitive figures (effective dates, post-2023 rule changes) into a single dated '规则版本/时效' section so stale values are easy to audit and do not pad the running prose.
Replace the pseudocode backtest snippets with minimal executable functions (or explicitly label them as illustrative) to push actionability toward copy-paste-ready.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense with specialized, non-obvious facts (board-specific price limits, post-2023 印花税 rates, margin maintenance ratios, auction timestamps) rather than concepts Claude already knows, but it is ~300 lines and scatters time-sensitive dates ('截至2026', '2023年减半', '2024年继续免征', 'MiCA 2024年生效') inline rather than in a deprecated section, which the guideline penalizes. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | It provides a concrete compliance checklist, specific cost/tax figures, and a fully worked output-format example, but the backtest snippets ('if daily_return >= limit_up: buy_signal无法执行') are pseudocode and there is no end-to-end executable pipeline, so it falls short of copy-paste-ready guidance. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The 分析框架 (constraint matrix, compliance checklist, tax impact) plus the output-format template give real structure, but the procedure is implied by topic grouping rather than laid out as an explicit numbered sequence, and there are no validation checkpoints (acceptable here since the task is analysis, not a destructive operation). | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Sections are well-organized with clear headers and tables, but the entire ~300-line reference is a monolithic single SKILL.md with no bundle files and no one-level-deep reference splitting, so per-market rule detail that could live in separate reference files is inline. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 8 / 12 Passed |