CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

regulatory-knowledge

金融监管知识库:A股涨跌停/ST退市新规/融券、港股T+0/做空机制、美股PDT/熔断、加密监管政策、跨境税务基础

58

Quality

68%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./agent/src/skills/regulatory-knowledge/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

65%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is a high-value, actionable regulatory reference with concrete numbers and a useful compliance checklist, but it is monolithic — all content is inlined with no reference files — and lacks explicit validation checkpoints in its analysis workflow.

Suggestions

Move per-market detail (港股/美股/加密 sections) into separate reference files (e.g. references/hk-us-crypto.md) and keep SKILL.md as an overview with clearly signaled one-level-deep links, improving progressive disclosure.

Add explicit validation checkpoints to the analysis framework (e.g. 'Verify each market's T+N and 涨跌停 assumptions against the current-date rule set before running the backtest') to raise workflow clarity.

Tighten repeated '回测影响' preamble lines and convert illustrative pseudocode blocks into concrete runnable snippets or clearly marked checklists.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

Dense reference content where most lines carry specific rule data Claude would not reliably know (limit percentages, T+N, fee rates, PDT thresholds, tax rates); assumes competence with only minor repeated '回测影响' framing that could be trimmed.

4 / 5

Actionability

Concrete numeric tables, fee breakdowns, time windows, PDT/熔断 thresholds, a checkbox compliance checklist, and a full example output report give mostly executable guidance; a few code blocks are illustrative pseudocode rather than runnable code.

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

An 分析框架 with a compliance checklist and a labeled output template provides a rough sequence, but validation checkpoints and error-recovery feedback loops are absent or only implicit.

3 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

No bundle/reference files exist and all ~300 lines are inlined in SKILL.md; header structure is decent, but market-specific detail that could live in separate reference files is monolithic rather than split with one-level-deep navigation.

3 / 5

Total

14

/

20

Passed

Description

71%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is specific and rich in natural domain keywords, clearly staking out a niche for cross-market regulatory rules. Its main weakness is the absence of an explicit 'when to use' clause, which leaves the trigger guidance implied rather than stated.

Suggestions

Add an explicit trigger clause such as 'Use when building backtests across A股/港股/美股/加密 markets, configuring compliance or risk parameters, or modeling cross-market trading-rule and tax impacts.'

Include a few synonym/variation trigger terms users might say (e.g. '涨跌停板', '做空限制', '日内交易', '回测规则约束') to round out keyword coverage.

Optionally split the long colon-separated topic list into a short 'what' sentence plus a 'Use when...' sentence so both what and when are explicit.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists multiple concrete, specific capability areas — 'A股涨跌停/ST退市新规/融券、港股T+0/做空机制、美股PDT/熔断、加密监管政策、跨境税务基础' — giving comprehensive coverage of the domain.

5 / 5

Completeness

The 'what' is clear (a knowledge base of these market rules) but there is no explicit 'Use when...' or equivalent trigger guidance, capping completeness at 3 per the rubric guideline.

3 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Strong natural keywords users would say (涨跌停, 融券, 做空, PDT, 熔断, T+0, 税务) but a few common variations/synonyms are absent and phrasing leans on a topic list rather than user-uttered triggers.

4 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

A clearly defined niche (cross-market regulatory rules for quant backtesting) with distinct triggers; only minor overlap risk with broader quant/trading skills.

4 / 5

Total

16

/

20

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository
HKUDS/Vibe-Trading
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.