Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, highly actionable fetch skill with clean progressive disclosure and copy-paste examples across both tool and script paths. Minor trimming of the Overview and an explicit validation checkpoint on the ticker→CIK resolution step would push it to the top of the scale.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Largely efficient and factual (CIK padding rule, throttle bucket, host bucket, env overrides are things Claude would not know), but the Overview paragraph restates SEC/EDGAR context and the link-convention blockquote is meta-guidance that could be trimmed. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides two copy-paste JSON tool-call examples, a complete annotated Python import block with return values, a runnable example script pointer, and a precise parameter/format table covering CIK padding, case-sensitive metrics, and ISO dates — fully executable across both tool and script paths. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Two clearly sequenced paths (tool vs script) with the ticker→CIK→filings→optional-XBRL resolution flow defined, but no explicit validation checkpoint on the resolution chain (e.g. verifying the padded CIK before the submissions call) and only a passing mention of the None-return case. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Clear overview plus well-signaled one-level-deep references to four reference files and one script, all verified to exist as real bundle files; contract/endpoint/concept details are appropriately split into separate files rather than inlined. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |