Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is concise, rule-driven, and well-structured with concrete tool invocations and a clean one-level reference to examples. It could push actionability and workflow clarity higher with fully realized example values and an explicit validate-retry loop.
Suggestions
Replace placeholder values like `<preset-name>` with one or two concrete preset names so examples are copy-paste ready.
Add an explicit validate-then-retry step for `set` operations (e.g., check the value back after setting) to strengthen the workflow feedback loop.
Show a minimal scratchpad read-back example inline so the cross-turn recall pattern is actionable without opening examples.md.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean rule-based body with no padding and no explanation of concepts Claude already knows; every section and table earns its tokens, matching anchor 5. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete executable calls like `my(action="check", key="context_window_tokens")` with specific keys and validation ranges, but some values are placeholders (`<preset-name>`) leaving minor gaps, fitting anchor 4. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear 'How to use' sequence with a validation checkpoint ('If set, warn the user before changing impactful settings') and guardrails via anti-patterns, but lacks an explicit validate-then-retry feedback loop, fitting anchor 4. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Concise overview body with a single well-signaled one-level reference to the verified references/examples.md, matching the clear-overview anchor 5. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |