CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

figure-designer

Advises on the design of the three core figures in a technical paper: the Motivated Example (Figure 1), the Solution Overview (Methodology), and the Experimental Results figures. Recommends the right design paradigm, layout, labelling, and tool for each figure type, then runs a quality-control audit. Use when the user asks to 'design a figure', 'draw Figure 1', 'plot experiment results', 'choose the right chart type', 'which figure tool to use', or 'figure looks unprofessional'.

80

Quality

100%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

100%Weight 40%Scale 1-3

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A well-crafted instruction skill: a sequenced procedure with an integrity-gate checklist, concrete defaults, and properly structured one-level-deep references. It assumes Claude's competence and avoids padding with known concepts, with only trivial trigger-list redundancy as a tightening opportunity.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

Lean for its scope: it assumes Claude's competence, never explaining what a figure, Matplotlib, or a colour palette is, and every section drives action. The only mild redundancy is the 'When to use' list restating the description's triggers, which is not enough to drop below the lean-and-efficient anchor.

3 / 3

Actionability

As an instruction-only skill it gives concrete, specific guidance — default palettes (ColorBrewer Qualitative / Viridis), an 8pt post-scaling font floor, per-figure-type tool defaults, an explicit universal-rule list, and a copy-ready Output format template — so the absence of code is not penalized.

3 / 3

Workflow Clarity

An explicit 8-step Core procedure is paired with a separate 7-item Integrity-gate checklist tagged [inspection]/[user-verify] and a defined failure path ('If any [inspection] check fails, mark the design as needs user attention'), matching the clear-sequence-with-validation-and-checklists anchor.

3 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

The body is an overview that defers detail to five clearly-signaled, one-level-deep reference files (motivated-example.md, solution-overview.md, experimental-results.md, tools.md, design-rules.md), all verified present in ./references/, with content appropriately split and easy to navigate.

3 / 3

Total

12

/

12

Passed

Description

100%Weight 40%Scale 1-3

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

An exemplary description: concrete actions, an explicit third-person 'Use when' trigger clause, and a distinct niche. It matches the rubric's good_overall_examples pattern closely, with no vague fluff or over-claims.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists multiple concrete actions — "Recommends the right design paradigm, layout, labelling, and tool for each figure type, then runs a quality-control audit" — naming the three figure types it targets, matching the 'lists multiple specific concrete actions' anchor.

3 / 3

Completeness

Explicitly answers both what (advises on design of the three core figures, recommends paradigm/layout/labelling/tool, runs a QC audit) and when (an explicit 'Use when the user asks to...' clause), satisfying the top anchor.

3 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

The 'Use when' clause gives natural phrases a user would actually say — 'design a figure', 'draw Figure 1', 'plot experiment results', 'choose the right chart type', 'which figure tool to use', 'figure looks unprofessional' — broad coverage of common variations.

3 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Occupies a clear niche — paper-figure design for three named figure types — with specific triggers unlikely to fire for adjacent skills it even names (intro-drafter, pre-submission-reviewer).

3 / 3

Total

12

/

12

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
HKUSTDial/Supervisor-Skills
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.