Content
100%Weight 40%Scale 1-3Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-crafted instruction skill: a sequenced procedure with an integrity-gate checklist, concrete defaults, and properly structured one-level-deep references. It assumes Claude's competence and avoids padding with known concepts, with only trivial trigger-list redundancy as a tightening opportunity.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean for its scope: it assumes Claude's competence, never explaining what a figure, Matplotlib, or a colour palette is, and every section drives action. The only mild redundancy is the 'When to use' list restating the description's triggers, which is not enough to drop below the lean-and-efficient anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | As an instruction-only skill it gives concrete, specific guidance — default palettes (ColorBrewer Qualitative / Viridis), an 8pt post-scaling font floor, per-figure-type tool defaults, an explicit universal-rule list, and a copy-ready Output format template — so the absence of code is not penalized. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | An explicit 8-step Core procedure is paired with a separate 7-item Integrity-gate checklist tagged [inspection]/[user-verify] and a defined failure path ('If any [inspection] check fails, mark the design as needs user attention'), matching the clear-sequence-with-validation-and-checklists anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is an overview that defers detail to five clearly-signaled, one-level-deep reference files (motivated-example.md, solution-overview.md, experimental-results.md, tools.md, design-rules.md), all verified present in ./references/, with content appropriately split and easy to navigate. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |