Content
57%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is admirably concise and well-structured for a small skill, but its workflow is too abstract to be directly actionable and lacks an explicit validation/feedback loop for a batch operation.
Suggestions
Add concrete guidance on how to size "bounded units" (e.g., target unit scope, max concurrent units) and how to invoke agent/worktree tools per unit.
Turn step 3 into an explicit validation checkpoint with a feedback loop, e.g. "Verify each unit's output; on failure, re-run or repair the failing unit before integrating."
Show one minimal example of partitioning a goal and dispatching units via the existing machinery so the workflow is copy-paste concrete.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is a lean ~20 lines with no padded explanation of concepts Claude already knows; every line carries load (invocation, when-to-use, non-goals, workflow). | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | The workflow steps ("Partition into bounded units", "Run units with existing agent/worktree tools", "Integrate results and verify") describe rather than instruct, offering no concrete method, commands, or executable examples for the core actions. | 1 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Steps are numbered in a clear sequence, but for a batch operation the "verify" step is not an explicit validation checkpoint with a fix-and-retry feedback loop, so workflow clarity is capped at 2. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is well under 50 lines with no need for external references, and the sections (Invocation, When to use, Non-goals, Workflow) are cleanly organized, satisfying the simple-skill path to a 3. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 9 / 12 Passed |