Content
85%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is a tight, highly actionable workflow with explicit validation checkpoints and a complete manifest example, held back from a perfect conciseness score only by repeated time-sensitive version pinning outside a deprecated section.
Suggestions
Move the 'v0.9.1' version pinning into a clearly labeled 'Version constraints' or 'Deprecated/old patterns' section, or state the behavior without hard-coding the version, so conciseness is not penalized for time-sensitive detail.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly lean and actionable, but it repeatedly pins a time-sensitive version number ('Codewhale v0.9.1') outside any 'old patterns' or 'deprecated' section, which the guideline says should penalize conciseness; it does not reach the 'every token earns its place' anchor. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | It provides concrete, copy-paste-ready commands ('/plugin validate <plugin-name>', '/plugin show', '/plugin enable', '/plugin trust', '/skills inspect', '/plugin list') and a complete executable plugin.toml example, matching the 'fully executable code/commands; copy-paste ready' anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The 8-step Workflow is clearly sequenced with explicit validation checkpoints (validate → show → enable → run the shown trust confirmation → enable again → verify via /skills inspect and /plugin list), including a feedback loop for error recovery. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is under roughly 50 lines, has no need for external references, and is well-organized into clear sections ('# Plugin Creator', '## Workflow'), which the guideline says lets progressive disclosure score 3 with just well-organized sections; no bundle files exist so no nested references to verify. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |