Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a tight, action-oriented workflow with explicit capability probing and platform-specific error handling, well-structured for a small single-purpose skill. Its only real weakness is the loose middle 'Do the work' step and the absence of exact tool-call syntax.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence — it names tools, parameters, and platform truths with no concept padding or verbosity, so every token earns its place. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete tool names and parameters are given throughout (recording_start with display/region/fps/durationSec/intervalMs, recording_stop with the returned id, screenshot, zoom), but no exact invocation syntax is shown, leaving a minor gap below fully copy-paste-ready. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear five-step numbered sequence includes a validation checkpoint ('Check request_access when readiness is unknown') and error guidance ('tell the user which, do not retry'), but step 3 ('Do the work') is loose, so it falls short of the explicit feedback-loop anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Under 50 lines with no external bundle files needed, the body is well-organized into a numbered workflow, Platform truths, and Screenshots sections, meeting the simple-skill exception for a top score. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |