Conciseness

The ~30-line body is lean and assumes Claude's competence: no explanation of what DI or Hilt is, every bullet is an instruction ('Use @Binds (abstract class) over @Provides when possible — generates smaller code'). Matches anchor 5 — every token earns its place; there is no padding to trim for anchor 4's 'minor instances of over-explanation'.

Actionability

Concrete directives name exact annotations ('Annotate `Application` class with `@HiltAndroidApp`', 'Use `@Inject constructor(...)` over field injection', 'Use `@AssistedInject` for runtime parameters'), fitting anchor 4's mostly-executable guidance. Not 5 because there is no inline code for the body's own cases (e.g. @AssistedInject) and scoping — a stated capability — has no body-level guidance or example.

Workflow Clarity

The numbered sequence (Bootstrap Hilt → Define Modules → Prefer Constructor Injection) is coherent for a low-risk configuration skill, so no validation cap applies. Not 5 because the bullet 'explicit with `@InstallIn` (`SingletonComponent`, `ViewModelComponent`)' is garbled, leaving one step's instruction ambiguous — a minor gap consistent with anchor 4 rather than 3, whose steps lack clear definition.

Progressive Disclosure

The single reference (references/files.md) is real, one level deep, and clearly linked from the relevant sections, with a short well-sectioned body. Not 5 because the scoping table inside files.md is never signposted from the body (the link is labeled only 'module templates') and the same link is repeated three times identically — minor organization gaps matching anchor 4.

Specificity

Names the domain (Hilt DI in Android) and enumerates several concrete capability areas — 'proper scoping, modules, and constructor injection' — matching the 'several specific actions; minor gaps' anchor. Not 5 because 'configure' is an umbrella action and coverage omits entry points, components, and multi-module setups; clearly above anchor 3's '1-2 concrete actions'.

Completeness

Explicitly answers both what ('Configure Hilt dependency injection with proper scoping, modules, and constructor injection') and when ('Use when changing the production Hilt graph') with concrete trigger phrases, plus explicit deferral guidance. This matches anchor 5; the 'when' is specific rather than the generic 'when working with...' of anchor 4.

Trigger Term Quality

Includes the natural terms users would say — 'Hilt', 'dependency injection', 'production Hilt graph' — giving good keyword coverage. Missing common synonyms such as 'Dagger', '@Inject', or bare 'DI', so it does not reach anchor 5's comprehensive synonym coverage.

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Occupies a clear niche (Hilt, production graph changes) and actively reduces conflict risk by deferring 'test overrides, Room wiring, navigation-specific scopes, and generic DI explanations to their specific skills'. Matches anchor 5's clear niche with minimal conflict risk.