angular-rxjs-interop
Bridge Observables and Signals using toSignal and toObservable in Angular. Use when converting between RxJS Observables and Angular Signals. (triggers: toSignal, toObservable, takeUntilDestroyed, rxjs angular)
79
73%
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
Pending
No eval scenarios have been run
Passed
No known issues
Optimize this skill with Tessl
npx tessl skill review --optimize ./skills/angular/angular-rxjs-interop/SKILL.mdQuality
Discovery
89%Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.
This is a solid skill description with excellent trigger terms and clear completeness. Its main weakness is that the 'what' portion could be more specific about the concrete actions performed beyond the general 'bridge' verb. The explicit trigger list and narrow domain focus make it highly distinctive and easy for Claude to match correctly.
Suggestions
Expand the capability description with more concrete actions, e.g., 'Convert Observable streams to Signals for template binding, wrap Signals as Observables for RxJS pipelines, manage automatic subscription cleanup with takeUntilDestroyed.'
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Specificity | Names the domain (Angular Signals/RxJS Observables) and the key actions (toSignal, toObservable), but doesn't list multiple concrete actions beyond 'bridge' — it could specify things like 'convert Observable streams to Signals for template use, wrap Signals as Observables for pipe operators, manage subscription cleanup with takeUntilDestroyed'. | 2 / 3 |
Completeness | Clearly answers both 'what' (bridge Observables and Signals using toSignal and toObservable in Angular) and 'when' (Use when converting between RxJS Observables and Angular Signals), with explicit trigger terms listed. | 3 / 3 |
Trigger Term Quality | Includes highly relevant natural keywords users would actually type: 'toSignal', 'toObservable', 'takeUntilDestroyed', 'rxjs angular', 'Observables', 'Signals'. These cover the main API names and conceptual terms a developer would use. | 3 / 3 |
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk | Very specific niche — the interop between RxJS Observables and Angular Signals is a narrow, well-defined topic. The trigger terms (toSignal, toObservable, takeUntilDestroyed) are highly distinctive and unlikely to conflict with other skills. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |
Implementation
57%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This skill provides a solid, well-structured overview of RxJS interop patterns in Angular with good anti-pattern guidance and appropriate progressive disclosure. Its main weaknesses are the lack of complete, executable code examples and some redundancy in the principles section. Adding a full component example would significantly improve actionability.
Suggestions
Add a complete, executable code example showing a component using toSignal with an HTTP call and toObservable with debounceTime/switchMap — this would elevate actionability from 2 to 3.
Remove the redundant 'Auto-Unsubscribe' bullet since it repeats information already in the first principle.
Add a brief step-by-step workflow for the common 'search with debounce' pattern: 1. Create signal, 2. toObservable, 3. pipe operators, 4. toSignal back — with a complete code block.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient but has some redundancy — 'Auto-Unsubscribe' bullet repeats what was already stated in the first principle ('toSignal auto-unsubscribes on component destroy'). Some bold formatting is excessive but content is generally tight. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides concrete API calls and patterns (toSignal, toObservable, takeUntilDestroyed) with inline code snippets, but lacks complete executable code examples — the HTTP example is a fragment rather than a copy-paste-ready block. No full component example showing the patterns in context. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The Observable-to-Signal and Signal-to-Observable workflows are described but not sequenced as clear step-by-step processes. The HTTP section provides some workflow (GET vs POST handling) but lacks explicit validation or error-recovery checkpoints beyond a brief catchError mention. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is concise and well-organized with clear sections (Principles, Guidelines, Anti-Patterns, References). It appropriately links to a single reference file for deeper content on Signals vs Observables, maintaining one-level-deep navigation. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 9 / 12 Passed |
Validation
100%Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.
Validation — 11 / 11 Passed
Validation for skill structure
No warnings or errors.
- Repository
- HoangNguyen0403/agent-skills-standard
- Commit
19a1140
- Reviewed
Table of Contents
Is this your skill?
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.