Content
88%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A lean, highly actionable standards reference with concrete examples and numeric limits throughout, and a properly structured one-level-deep bundle reference. The main quality issues are rule repetition across sections (especially the I-prefix rule) and a slightly odd "Canonical response anchors" section that restates existing rules as response phrasing.
Suggestions
State the I-prefix and folder-depth rules once each; the Anti-Patterns and Canonical response anchors sections repeat them two to three times.
Clarify the purpose of the "Canonical response anchors" section or fold it into the rules — as written it reads as response-phrasing metadata rather than skill guidance.
Annotate the reference link with what it contains (e.g., full naming table including guards, interceptors, models, and signal/observable member naming) so the split between body and reference is deliberate.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense and bullet-driven with no padding or explanations of concepts Claude already knows, but it could be tightened: the I-prefix rule is stated three times (Naming Standards, Anti-Patterns, and the Canonical response anchors section) and the folder-depth limit twice. This matches the 4 anchor (efficient with minor instances that could be trimmed) rather than 5, where every token earns its place. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Every rule is concrete and executable: exact file patterns ("hero-list.component.ts", "auth.service.ts", "app.routes.ts"), numeric limits (functions < 75 lines, files < 400 lines, depth ≤ 3 levels), class/selector naming with examples, and named folder destinations ("src/app/core/", "src/app/features/"). Specific examples cover the common cases, matching the 5 anchor; the absence of code is not penalized for an instruction-only skill. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | This is a single-purpose standards skill with no multi-step process, so the simple-skill exception applies: the single action (apply these naming and structure rules) is unambiguous, and the "Refactor if larger" directive is clear. There are no destructive or batch operations that would require validation checkpoints. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is a well-organized overview with a clearly signaled, real, one-level-deep reference ([Naming Conventions](references/naming-convention.md), verified to exist). It falls short of 5 because the body's Naming Standards section duplicates part of the reference's table content and the link carries no hint of what the reference adds (guards, interceptors, models, member naming), a minor organization gap matching the 4 anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |