Content
92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is an exemplary instruction-only skill: precisely formatted rules, a numbered workflow with validation checkpoints and feedback loops, and a clean one-level-deep reference split that checks out against the actual bundle. The only nit is mild duplication between the Red Flags and Anti-Patterns sections.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense and lean with no explanation of known concepts, but the Red Flags and Anti-Patterns sections restate the same rules (e.g. "list three options to look thorough" vs "No padded options: never invent alternatives to reach three"; "approval to publish means deploy" vs "No scope transfer"), which could be merged. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Fully actionable for a process skill: exact tier thresholds (0-2/3-4/5-6), literal state syntax 'approval: pending | approved(<who>, <YYYY-MM-DD>) | assumed-autonomous', evidence tag formats 'confirmed(<path>)', 'Max 3 per round, each with a recommended default and 2-3 options', the exact reply phrase 'Reply ok or corrections', and copy-paste templates in the reference files. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Numbered sections 1-8 follow execution order with an explicit self-review checklist (placeholders, contradictions, multi-plan scope, two-reading ambiguities), a feedback loop ('Allow one correction round'), and hard gates ('tier=high still blocks pending explicit human sign-off'), matching the anchor for clear sequence with explicit validation. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | All three referenced files (references/contract-template.md, references/evidence-ledger.md, references/option-card.md) exist, are one level deep, are listed with links in a References section, and hold the templates/detail split out of the ~80-line overview body. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |