The description names the domain (pre-write skill violation audit) and some actions (checks planned code against anti-patterns, auto-fixes), but doesn't list multiple specific concrete actions beyond 'checks' and 'load as composite'. The actual audit actions are somewhat vague.

Clearly answers both 'what' (checks planned code against loaded skill anti-patterns before any file write) and 'when' (when writing Flutter/Dart code, editing SKILL.md files, or generating any code where project skills are active). Includes explicit trigger guidance and even conditional loading instructions.

Includes some relevant keywords like 'Flutter/Dart code', 'SKILL.md files', 'anti-patterns', 'code', and 'project skills', but the trigger terms are somewhat niche and technical. Terms like 'violation audit' and 'composite' are not things users would naturally say.

This is a very specific niche — a pre-write audit against skill anti-patterns — that is unlikely to conflict with other skills. The description clearly distinguishes it as a meta-skill that operates before file writes, and the composite loading instruction further clarifies its role.

Generally efficient and avoids explaining concepts Claude already knows. However, some sections are slightly verbose — the Root Cause table and Anti-Patterns list could be tightened, and the detection flow ASCII diagram partially duplicates the numbered checkpoint steps above it.

Provides a concrete, structured violation report format with exact field names, a clear decision tree for when to act, specific examples (Flutter hardcoded colors, React class components, SKILL.md line limits), and explicit anti-patterns. The guidance is immediately actionable without ambiguity.

The workflow is clearly sequenced: check extension → audit against rules → report if violation → fix immediately. Includes a pre-completion catch-all checkpoint ('Did I write code? Did I audit skills?') as a validation/feedback loop. Anti-patterns section explicitly addresses common workflow shortcuts that could be skipped.

References `references/violation-examples.md` for more examples, which is good progressive disclosure. However, no bundle files are provided, so the reference is unverifiable. The main content is well-structured with clear sections but the violation report format and root cause guide are inline when they could potentially be extracted to a reference file to keep the overview leaner.