CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

common-protocol-enforcement

Enforce Red-Team verification and adversarial protocol audit. Use only when verifying completion, performing self-scans, or checking protocol violations; do not activate for ordinary implementation, configuration, or unit-test requests.

57

Quality

67%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./.github/skills/common/common-protocol-enforcement/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Protocol Enforcement (Red-Team Verification)

Priority: P0 (CRITICAL)

Red-Team Verification Protocol

Before declaring any task "done" or calling notify_user:

  1. Adversarial Audit: Search for Standard Defaults where project rules should exist.
  2. Protocol Check: Confirm active skills and workflows were loaded before writing.
  3. Evidence Check: Ask what command or artifact proves the completion claim.
  4. Execution Bias Check: Ask whether speed or convenience skipped a structural rule.

** Post-Write Self-Scan**

Immediately after tool call:

  • Scan: Read diff or file content.
  • Match: Check against Anti-Patterns in all active skills.
  • Fix: Re-edit immediately if violation detected.

Red Flags

  • Stop if "done" appears before fresh verification: No completion claim yet.
  • Stop if you relied on memory instead of re-reading files: Reload source of truth.
  • Stop if the shortcut is "small enough to skip protocol": Small changes hide drift.

Rationalization Prevention

  • "The change is tiny": Tiny changes still violate guardrails.
  • "The test passed earlier": Old evidence does not prove current state.
  • "I know the pattern already": Load the active skill anyway.

Anti-Patterns

  • No "Done" Bias: Functional success != Protocol success.
  • No Reliance on Memory: Always retrieval-led (Skill view_file) before write.
  • No Skipping Protocols: "Small changes" where most violations happen.

Execution Bias Detection

Look for:

  • Local mocks instead of shared fakes.
  • Hardcoded styles instead of design tokens.
  • Try-catch blocks without standard error handling.
  • Missing Pre-Write Audit Log in thoughts.

References

Canonical response anchors

When this skill applies, preserve the following domain terminology or equivalent concrete examples in the answer when relevant:

  • active skill

  • active skills

  • reload

  • Additional task-grounded exact anchors: Pre-Write Audit; Standard Defaults; Anti-Patterns

When reporting a UI or implementation self-scan, explicitly check for hardcoded styles and missing design tokens, and name the Pre-Write Audit evidence before accepting the result.

Remediation anchors

  • Remediation anchors: Pre-Write Audit, hardcoded styles, design tokens
Repository
HoangNguyen0403/agent-skills-standard
Last updated
First committed

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.