Content
50%Weight 40%Scale 1-3Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A compact, single-purpose protocol/audit skill with a reasonable checklist structure, but it suffers from redundant sections, abstract rather than concrete verification steps, and an unused references section.
Suggestions
Merge the redundant "Red Flags", "Rationalization Prevention", and "Anti-Patterns" sections into one consolidated list to remove triplication.
Make the protocol steps concrete and executable — specify how to detect a "Standard Default" (e.g., a concrete search pattern or file check) rather than leaving it as an abstract directive.
Remove the empty "References" header or link it to references/example.md with a clear signal of what it contains.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is short and bullet-form, but the "Red Flags", "Rationalization Prevention", and "Anti-Patterns" sections restate the same guardrail three different ways, which could be consolidated. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | It gives a checklist of things to look for ("local mocks instead of shared fakes", "hardcoded styles instead of design tokens"), but the main protocol steps are abstract directives like "Search for Standard Defaults" with no concrete command or method. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A numbered 4-step protocol and a Scan/Match/Fix loop are present with an implicit feedback loop, but the validation checkpoints are conceptual rather than concretely specified and the sections overlap without a crisp sequence. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is self-contained with organized sections, but the "References" header is empty and the bundle references/example.md is only a placeholder not linked from the body; organization is adequate but not clearly navigated. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 8 / 12 Passed |