Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A tight, well-structured decision skill with a clear sequenced workflow, concrete prioritization rules, and an output template. Its main weakness is a dangling reference to original-texts.md that is not present in the bundle, which weakens progressive disclosure.
Suggestions
Add the missing original-texts.md to the skill bundle (or remove the broken reference) so the '原著依据' link resolves.
Make the verification checkpoint concrete — state what '验证' means operationally (e.g., observable completion signal) so the workflow_clarity step is unambiguous.
Consider moving the detailed priority-selection rationale into a short references file and keeping SKILL.md as an overview, to better fit progressive-disclosure expectations.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and efficient — short 用/不用 lists, a numbered 操作规程, a compact output template, and terse 纪律/交接 sections; assumes Claude's competence with no concept padding. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Gives concrete prioritization tiers (首选/次选/末选), an explicit declaration-and-lock output template, and handoff routing to related skills; as a decision/heuristic skill it has no executable code, but guidance is mostly actionable with minor gaps in how 'verify' is operationalized. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear 7-step sequence with an explicit verify step ('彻底 + 验证…不做一半就转向') and a post-completion re-estimation loop ('战役间隙…重估剩余任务'); the verification is present but loosely defined, leaving a minor checkpoint gap. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Body is well-sectioned, but the only external reference '[original-texts.md](original-texts.md)' points to a file that does not exist in the bundle (no references/scripts/assets dirs), so the navigation reference is broken. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |