CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

concentrate-forces

触发:当多个任务同时争夺时间、注意力、算力或预算,必须确定主攻方向并停止分散用力时调用;常见信号包括优先级过多、资源紧张、推进分散、需要决定先做什么。 English: Trigger when limited resources are being split across too many tasks and one main target must be chosen. Use this skill to concentrate effort, sequence work decisively, and finish a meaningful breakthrough before expanding.

64

Quality

76%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./skills/concentrate-forces/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

70%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is a well-structured, actionable instruction skill with a clear multi-step workflow and explicit validation checkpoints. Its main weaknesses are content repetition across several tables/sections and a dangling reference to a non-existent original-texts.md file.

Suggestions

Remove or create the missing original-texts.md (referenced on line 17): either add a references/ directory with the file, or drop the reference so the skill is self-contained.

Consolidate the redundant restatements — the '常见错误' table and the '十大军事原则在通用场景中的应用' table largely repeat '方法流程'; merge or cut to reduce token cost.

Add one fully worked example of the priority matrix (a filled-in 🎯 template with several real tasks) to lift actionability from good to copy-paste ready.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

Mostly efficient with well-structured lists, but the same core principle is restated multiple times ('伤其十指不如断其一指' appears three times) and the '常见错误' table plus the '十大军事原则应用' and '与其他skill的关系' sections restate ideas already covered in '方法流程'.

3 / 5

Actionability

Provides concrete executable guidance — a literal output template (🎯 当前主攻目标 / 完成信号 / 暂缓任务), a TodoWrite-driven priority matrix (影响范围/解决难度/依赖关系), and an explicit decision rule for mid-task new requests — though a fully worked example is absent.

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

A clear six-step sequence with explicit validation checkpoints ('验证完成——确认问题确实被彻底解决了', '主攻目标完成并验证后,才转向下一个目标') and a pre-action readiness checklist (investigation-first), plus a feedback loop (criticism-self-criticism between cycles).

5 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

Sections are well-organized, but the body points to a referenced file that does not exist ('详细原著依据见 original-texts.md' with no references/ directory present), a broken one-level-deep reference that signals a real organization defect.

3 / 5

Total

15

/

20

Passed

Description

83%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A well-constructed description that clearly states both the triggering conditions and the concrete actions the skill performs, using natural trigger language in both Chinese and English. Its only weakness is modest overlap potential with general prioritization skills and a few missing trigger synonyms.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists several concrete actions ('concentrate effort, sequence work decisively, and finish a meaningful breakthrough before expanding') rather than vague language, with only minor coverage gaps typical of a process/behavioral skill.

4 / 5

Completeness

Explicitly answers both 'when' ('触发:当…时调用' / 'Trigger when limited resources are being split…') and 'what' ('concentrate effort, sequence work decisively, and finish a meaningful breakthrough') with concrete trigger phrases.

5 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Includes natural trigger phrases users would say ('resources split across too many tasks', '优先级过多、资源紧张、推进分散、需要决定先做什么') with good synonym coverage across time/attention/budget, though a few common variations are missing.

4 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Occupies a fairly distinct niche (resource-concentration / prioritization under scarcity) with specific triggers, carrying only minor overlap risk with closely related planning or prioritization skills.

4 / 5

Total

17

/

20

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
HughYau/qiushi-skill
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.