CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

mass-line

触发:当你需要收集多方意见、把零散反馈整合成可执行方案,或把方案带回真实使用者/执行者验证时调用;常见信号包括 stakeholder input、user feedback、意见汇总、对齐与验证。 English: Trigger when input must be gathered from many people, synthesized into a clearer plan, and returned to the affected users or executors for validation. Use this skill for a collect-synthesize-validate loop.

60

Quality

71%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./skills/mass-line/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

63%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body delivers a clear, well-sequenced method with a concrete operating procedure and validation loop, but it is padded with repeated quotes and conceptual explanation Claude largely already knows. Progressive disclosure is weakened by a referenced file that does not exist.

Suggestions

Create the referenced references/original-texts.md (or remove the reference) so the signaled deep-dive actually resolves.

Trim the repeated Mao quotes restated under each of the five steps; cite once and let the steps stand on their own to improve conciseness.

Move the extended conceptual mapping and common-errors material into a separate file, keeping SKILL.md as a lean overview pointing one level deep.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

Mostly efficient but padded with repeated Mao quotes at each step and conceptual framing Claude already grasps; could be tightened without losing the core method.

3 / 5

Actionability

The operating procedure gives concrete steps plus a fixed output-format template and a validation closed-loop; minor gaps remain as the methodology steps stay somewhat abstract.

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

A clear 5-step sequence is reinforced by an operating procedure with explicit validation checkpoints and a feedback loop for error recovery, but one checkpoint could be more concrete.

4 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

It signals an original-texts.md reference, but no references/ bundle exists so the link is broken; the body also inlines philosophical content that could be split out.

3 / 5

Total

14

/

20

Passed

Description

78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is strong: it states concrete capabilities, gives explicit bilingual trigger guidance with natural signal terms, and cleanly answers both what and when. It is mostly distinct from sibling skills with only minor overlap risk.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Names the domain (multi-party opinion gathering) with 2-3 concrete actions ('collect…synthesize into a clearer plan…returned for validation'), but coverage is not comprehensive enough for a 4.

3 / 5

Completeness

Explicitly answers both what (gather→synthesize→validate) and when, with concrete trigger phrases and signal keywords; not a 4 because the 'when' is fully explicit.

5 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Natural signals like 'stakeholder input', 'user feedback', '意见汇总', '对齐与验证' are included and would plausibly be said, though a few common phrasings are missing.

4 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The collect-synthesize-validate framing carves a clear niche with mostly distinct triggers, though minor overlap exists with related investigation/analysis skills.

4 / 5

Total

16

/

20

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
HughYau/qiushi-skill
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.