Content
62%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body presents a clear, well-sequenced methodology with explicit validation and feedback loops, plus a concrete operation procedure with an output template. It is weakened by repetitive restatements of the core loop, partly abstract step guidance, and a dangling reference to a non-existent original-texts.md.
Suggestions
Consolidate the collect→synthesize→return→validate→loop explanation into one authoritative section and remove its redundant restatements in 方法流程, 操作规程, and the 常见错误 table.
Create the referenced original-texts.md (or remove the dangling reference) and move the per-step Mao quotes there, keeping SKILL.md as a lean overview.
Tighten the 方法流程 steps with concrete, executable guidance (e.g., specific prompts or checklists) rather than abstract verbs like 归类整理 and 提炼综合.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The collect-synthesize-validate loop is restated across 核心原则, 方法流程, 操作规程, and the 常见错误 table, and Mao quotes repeat at each step; the content is skill-specific but could be tightened by deduplicating these restatements. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | 操作规程 provides a concrete output template, named sub-skill (contradiction-analysis), and concrete source categories, but the larger 方法流程 steps remain abstract (归类整理, 提炼综合) rather than executable. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear 5-step sequence (收集→集中→返回→检验→再收集) is framed as an explicit loop with validation checkpoints (第四步 检验 and 操作规程 step 5 验证闭环) and an error-recovery feedback path. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Sections are well-organized, but the body references original-texts.md which does not exist as a bundle file, and all ~180 lines of content (including the quotes that belong in that file) are inline rather than split out. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 9 / 12 Passed |