Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A concise, well-structured strategy skill with a clear procedure and output template, but its two file references point to bundle files that do not exist, which hurts actionability, workflow clarity, and especially progressive disclosure.
Suggestions
Create the missing referenced files (phase-assessment-guide.md with the phase indicators, original-texts.md with source texts), or inline the phase indicators so step 2 is self-contained.
Verify every markdown link in the body resolves to a real bundle file; broken references currently cap progressive_disclosure at 3.
If the phase-assessment indicators are essential to executing the workflow, surface at least the key distinguishing criteria inline rather than deferring entirely to an external file.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and well-sectioned (用/不用, 操作规程, 输出模板, 纪律, 交接) with no padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows; every section earns its place, including the brief grounding quote. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides a concrete 5-step procedure plus a fill-in output template, but step 2 defers phase indicators to 'phase-assessment-guide.md', a referenced file that does not exist in the bundle — a minor executable gap. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear sequenced 5-step procedure with explicit checkpoints ('当 [里程碑] 达成时转入 [下一阶段]') and discipline feedback rules, but the phase-determination step is under-specified inline because its indicators live in a missing referenced file. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized inline sections with one-level-deep, clearly signaled markdown links, but both referenced files (phase-assessment-guide.md, original-texts.md) are absent from the bundle, so navigation breaks — worse than the minor gaps a 4 would allow. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |