Content
77%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body delivers a clear, actionable, well-sequenced workflow with explicit checkpoints and a concrete operation template. Its main weaknesses are atmospheric quote-padding that could be tightened and a referenced support file (original-texts.md) that does not exist in the bundle.
Suggestions
Either add the missing references/original-texts.md or remove the dangling reference so progressive disclosure resolves to real files.
Trim the Mao epigraphs to one anchor quote and consolidate the overlapping '何时使用' and '不适用场景' sections to improve token efficiency.
Consider moving the common-errors table and stage details into a single one-level-deep reference to keep SKILL.md as a lean overview.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | It avoids explaining concepts Claude already knows and is purposefully organized, but the repeated Mao quotations, atmospheric framing, and overlap between '何时使用', '不适用场景', and the methodology add tokens that could be tightened, fitting 'mostly efficient but includes some unnecessary explanation'. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides concrete executable guidance: a mandated stage-assessment table, a literal fill-in template, explicit stage definitions, and required actions ('必须同时给出局部进攻点', '设置阶段检查点'), which is actionable without needing code per the instruction-skill scoring note. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A clearly sequenced six-step methodology is reinforced by an operation procedure with explicit validation checkpoints ('在完成 [具体里程碑] 后,重新调用此 skill 评估阶段', '转入下一阶段的条件:当 [具体条件] 时') that function as feedback loops. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Sections are well-organized, but the body is a ~160-line monolithic overview and the single external reference ('详细原著依据见 original-texts.md') points to a file that is not present in the bundle, so the one-level-deep reference does not resolve. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |