spark-prairie-fire

触发：当你从零起步、资源极少、需要先找到最小可行切入口并建立稳定根据地时调用；常见信号包括 bootstrap、MVP、pilot、first foothold、小团队起步。 English: Trigger when starting from almost nothing and needing a viable foothold before scaling up. Use this skill to build a durable base, start small, and grow from a validated nucleus instead of scattering effort.

Quality

72%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

Securityby

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./skills/spark-prairie-fire/SKILL.md

Quality

Content

62%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The content shines on workflow clarity with explicit gated checklists and a sequenced operation protocol, but is held back by redundancy/philosophical padding, partly abstract method guidance, and a dangling reference to a missing original-texts.md file.

Suggestions

Create references/original-texts.md (or remove the "见 original-texts.md" reference) so the one external link resolves instead of dangling.

Consolidate the duplicated material in "根据地建设的四个要素" and "常见错误" into the step flow to cut redundancy and tokens.

Tighten 第一步–第五步 from descriptive prose into concrete evaluation criteria (e.g. specific signals that "干柴"/real demand is present) to lift actionability.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Conciseness	The body is mostly efficient and well-sectioned, but repeats concepts across "根据地建设的四个要素", "常见错误", and 第五步, and leans on decorative Mao quotes, so it could be tightened rather than being fully lean.	2 / 3
Actionability	The 操作规程 offers concrete fill-in templates and a checklist, but the bulk of 第一步–第五步 is methodological/descriptive prose ("评估客观条件", "选定根据地") without concrete method, so guidance is only partly actionable.	2 / 3
Workflow Clarity	A clear five-step flow plus a four-step 操作规程 with explicit validation gates ("条件不足 → 先调用 investigation-first，不急于行动", the 流寇主义检查 [ ] checklist with "未稳固不得扩展") provides sequenced checkpoints and feedback loops.	3 / 3
Progressive Disclosure	Sections are well organized, but all content is inline in a ~150-line SKILL.md and the one external reference ("详细原著依据见 original-texts.md") points to a file that does not exist in any bundle directory, so structure is present but navigation is not sound.	2 / 3
	Total	9 / 12 Passed

Description

82%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is strong on completeness and trigger-term coverage, with explicit bilingual trigger clauses and natural signal words. It is weaker on specificity (abstract methodological actions) and has moderate overlap risk with general planning skills.

Suggestions

Replace abstract verbs ("build a durable base", "grow from a validated nucleus") with more concrete capability verbs so the skill's actions are unambiguous.

Add a differentiating cue that separates this from generic MVP/planning skills (e.g. the base-area-vs-scattering distinction) directly in the description.

Trim the bilingual duplication; a single concise trigger clause reduces token cost without losing the explicit 'when'.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Specificity	Quotes "build a durable base, start small, and grow from a validated nucleus instead of scattering effort" name the domain and several actions, but the actions are methodological/abstract rather than the concrete operations the score-3 anchor expects (e.g. "extract text, fill forms, merge documents").	2 / 3
Completeness	Explicit trigger guidance is present in both languages ("触发：当你从零起步…调用" / "Trigger when starting from almost nothing…"), and the what is stated ("build a durable base, start small, and grow from a validated nucleus"), so both what and when are answered.	3 / 3
Trigger Term Quality	"常见信号包括 bootstrap、MVP、pilot、first foothold、小团队起步" plus "starting from almost nothing" / "viable foothold" give good coverage of natural terms a user would actually say when they need this skill.	3 / 3
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk	The foothold/MVP framing is a recognizable niche, but "start small / build a base / MVP" overlaps with generic project-planning and other strategy skills, so it is somewhat specific yet could still conflict with similar skills.	2 / 3
	Total	10 / 12 Passed

Validation

100%

Warnings & errors only

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository: HughYau/qiushi-skill
Path: skills/spark-prairie-fire/SKILL.md
Commit: 6710791

Reviewed: 6 days ago

Table of Contents

Discovery Implementation Validation

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.