CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

gifgrep

Search GIF providers with CLI/TUI, download results, and extract stills/sheets.

76

2.16x
Quality

68%

Does it follow best practices?

Impact

93%

2.16x

Average score across 3 eval scenarios

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No known issues

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./skills/gifgrep/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

87%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

This is a well-crafted, concise skill that provides highly actionable CLI examples for the gifgrep tool. Its main weakness is that the multi-step workflow (search → preview → download → extract) is mentioned but not explicitly sequenced with validation checkpoints, which would help Claude chain operations reliably. Overall, it's an effective reference that respects token budget while covering all key features.

Suggestions

Add an explicit end-to-end workflow section that sequences the search → download → extract steps with validation (e.g., check file exists before running `gifgrep still`/`gifgrep sheet`).

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The content is lean and efficient. Every line provides actionable information—command examples, flags, and environment variables—without explaining what GIFs are or how CLI tools work. No wasted tokens.

3 / 3

Actionability

Nearly every section provides concrete, copy-paste-ready commands. The quick start, download, stills/sheets, and provider sections all give specific executable examples with real flags and arguments.

3 / 3

Workflow Clarity

The opening line mentions a 'Search → preview → download → extract' workflow, but the steps aren't sequenced with explicit validation or checkpoints. The sections are organized by feature rather than as a guided multi-step process, and there's no error handling or verification guidance (e.g., checking if download succeeded before extracting stills).

2 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

For a simple, single-file skill under 50 lines with no need for external references, the content is well-organized into clearly labeled sections that are easy to scan. The structure is appropriate for the scope of the tool.

3 / 3

Total

11

/

12

Passed

Description

50%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is concise and identifies a clear niche with specific actions (search, download, extract stills/sheets from GIFs via CLI/TUI), making it distinctive. However, it lacks a 'Use when...' clause entirely, which significantly hurts completeness, and the trigger terms could better cover natural user language variations.

Suggestions

Add a 'Use when...' clause with explicit triggers, e.g., 'Use when the user wants to search for GIFs, download animated images, create sprite sheets, or extract frames from GIF files.'

Include common natural trigger terms and variations such as 'animated image', 'giphy', 'tenor', 'sprite sheet', 'GIF frames', '.gif' to improve discoverability.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists multiple specific concrete actions: search GIF providers, download results, and extract stills/sheets. Also mentions CLI/TUI as the interface, adding specificity.

3 / 3

Completeness

Describes what the skill does but completely lacks a 'Use when...' clause or any explicit trigger guidance. Per the rubric, a missing 'Use when...' clause caps completeness at 2, and since the 'when' is entirely absent, this scores a 1.

1 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

Includes relevant terms like 'GIF', 'CLI/TUI', 'download', 'stills', 'sheets', but misses common user variations like 'animated image', 'sprite sheet', 'giphy', 'tenor', or file extensions like '.gif'. Users might not naturally say 'extract stills' or 'GIF providers'.

2 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The combination of GIF searching, downloading from providers via CLI/TUI, and extracting stills/sheets is a very specific niche that is unlikely to conflict with other skills.

3 / 3

Total

9

/

12

Passed

Validation

72%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation8 / 11 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

metadata_version

'metadata.version' is missing

Warning

metadata_field

'metadata' should map string keys to string values

Warning

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

8

/

11

Passed

Repository
Hung-Reo/hungreo-openclaw
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.