CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

qtpass-docs

Documentation guide for QtPass - README, FAQ, localization

56

Quality

64%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./.opencode/skills/qtpass-docs/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is an actionable, well-structured documentation skill dominated by concrete commands, templates, and validation guidance rather than filler. Its main weaknesses are mild redundancy in the linting sections and a few implicit validation steps in the FAQ workflow.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is mostly commands, tables, and templates without explaining concepts Claude already knows; the only trimming needed is mild redundancy (repeated prettier examples and "THIS IS THE PATTERN" emphasis).

4 / 5

Actionability

It provides copy-paste-ready commands (prettier, doxygen, grep) and concrete templates (FAQ entry, Doxygen block, CHANGELOG format); minor placeholders like <markdown-file> and a few implicit steps keep it just short of fully comprehensive.

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

Sequenced workflows like "Adding New FAQ Entry" and explicit validation checkpoints (prettier --check, doxygen warnings-as-errors with a local pre-push run) are present, though FAQ validation ("Test the changes render correctly") is somewhat implicit.

4 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

Content is well-organized with clear section headers and tables, and the single cross-skill reference to qtpass-localization is one level deep and clearly signaled; no bundle files exist, so all guidance lives inline with only minor organization gaps.

4 / 5

Total

16

/

20

Passed

Description

53%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description clearly identifies the QtPass documentation scope and relevant artifacts but lacks any explicit "when to use" trigger guidance, which limits its completeness. It is reasonably specific and distinct but would benefit from concrete action verbs and natural trigger phrases.

Suggestions

Add an explicit 'Use when...' clause stating when Claude should invoke this skill (e.g., updating README/FAQ, regenerating API docs, or localizing QtPass docs).

Replace the generic verb 'guide' with concrete actions like 'update', 'format', and 'generate' for README, FAQ, and Doxygen API docs.

Include natural trigger synonyms such as 'docs', 'translation', 'i18n', and 'changelog' to broaden keyword coverage.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

"Documentation guide for QtPass - README, FAQ, localization" names the domain plus three concrete artifacts, but the only action verb is the generic "guide"; coverage is not comprehensive and no editing/updating actions are stated.

3 / 5

Completeness

It gives a clear "what" (a documentation guide for QtPass covering README/FAQ/localization) but has no "Use when..." clause or equivalent trigger guidance, which caps completeness at 3 per the rubric.

3 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

"README", "FAQ", "localization", and "documentation" are natural terms a user might say, but common synonyms and variations (docs, translation, i18n, changelog) are missing.

3 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Tying the skill to the specific QtPass project gives it a clear niche with minimal conflict risk, though "documentation guide" is still broad enough to overlap slightly with general docs skills.

4 / 5

Total

13

/

20

Passed

Validation

87%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation14 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

metadata_version

'metadata.version' is missing

Warning

relative_links

Relative link issues: 1 missing, 1 suspicious

Warning

Total

14

/

16

Passed

Repository
IJHack/QtPass
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.