Content
100%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
Excellent body: every section is operational, the fix loop has explicit validation checkpoints, and bundle files are well-signaled and appropriately used. No dimension shows more than the most minor room for improvement.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and efficient throughout: dense tables for check codes and fix actions, copy-paste command blocks, and only non-obvious domain knowledge (e.g. 'trailing whitespace in <source> is significant and editors strip it', 'Slovenian shares many words with Croatian and Serbian'). No padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows; the brief intro's failure examples ('a dropped </b> that turns a whole dialog bold') complement rather than repeat the table's technical conditions. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Fully executable guidance: exact script invocations with flags and exit statuses ('python3 "$A" --leak mogoče,prepričani,odložišče,počiščeno --skip sl,hr,sr,sr_Cyrl'), a per-finding fix table mapping each code to a concrete action, a git command to audit only PR-touched files, compile checks (xmllint, lrelease6 with temp .qm), and the full contribution-cleanup commit sequence. Not a 4 because there are no gaps — common cases are covered with copy-paste-ready commands. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The audit → fix → re-audit loop is explicitly sequenced with a hard validation gate ('Repeat steps 2 and 3 until it prints total: clean (exit status 0). Do not stop on "mostly clean"') plus a separate compile-check step with expected outputs. This is a batch operation and the feedback loop is present and explicit, so the batch-operation cap does not apply; error recovery paths (revert to empty unfinished) are given per finding. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Bundled files are listed up front with one-level-deep links that exist on disk, each with a clear when-to-read signal ('read when a string passes the script but looks wrong, or when deciding whether a machine translation is salvageable'). The script's detailed check semantics are correctly pushed to the script itself, general translation workflow is delegated to the sibling skill, and the body keeps only the operational overview. Not a 4 because navigation and content split have no gaps. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 20 / 20 Passed |