CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

qtpass-localization-audit

QtPass localization audit - structural checks on .ts files (placeholders, HTML balance, mnemonics, mixed-script artifacts)

65

Quality

79%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./.opencode/skills/qtpass-localization-audit/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

88%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is highly actionable with complete, runnable scripts and a well-sequenced, validated cleanup workflow. The main improvement is structural: some inline catalogs and targeted-pattern scripts could move to reference files for leaner top-level disclosure.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

Mostly efficient — the bulk is executable heredoc scripts and a genuinely skill-specific artifact catalog, but the intro bullet list partly restates what the code comments already check, and the 12-item pattern catalog could be trimmed slightly.

4 / 5

Actionability

Fully executable, copy-paste-ready Python heredoc scripts plus concrete git and lrelease6 commands, with specific examples covering the common single-file, all-files sweep, and targeted-pattern cases.

5 / 5

Workflow Clarity

The 'Standard cleanup workflow' is a clear 7-step sequence with explicit validation checkpoints (run audit, re-run to confirm 0 findings, lrelease6 smoke test) and a per-finding decision tree, providing feedback loops for this batch operation.

5 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

Well-organized into clearly signaled sections with working internal anchors ([Quick audit](#quick-audit), [Targeted patterns](#targeted-patterns)); no bundle files exist, but a doc this long could split the targeted-pattern scripts or artifact catalog into reference files, leaving minor organization gaps.

4 / 5

Total

18

/

20

Passed

Description

70%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is specific and clearly occupies a distinct niche, but it lacks an explicit 'when to use' trigger clause, which caps completeness. Adding a 'Use when...' sentence referencing translation contributions or .ts file review would lift it.

Suggestions

Append a 'Use when...' clause, e.g. 'Use when reviewing or merging .ts translation contributions, especially machine-translated batches.'

Add natural synonyms like 'translation files' or 'i18n' alongside 'localization' to broaden trigger coverage.

Optionally mention wrong-string mappings / cross-language leaks if they should be part of the headline scope.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Names the domain ('structural checks on .ts files') and lists four concrete check areas in parens — 'placeholders, HTML balance, mnemonics, mixed-script artifacts' — which is several specific actions, but it omits other checks the body covers (wrong-string mappings, cross-language leaks), so minor gaps remain.

4 / 5

Completeness

It clearly states the 'what' (structural checks on .ts files with enumerated checks) but provides no 'Use when...' trigger guidance, so per the rubric 'when' is only weakly implied and completeness is capped at 3.

3 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Good keyword coverage with natural domain terms ('localization', '.ts files', 'placeholders', 'mnemonics', 'mixed-script'), though common synonyms like 'translation', 'i18n', or 'Qt translation files' are missing.

4 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

A clear niche — QtPass-specific structural audits of .ts translation files — with distinct triggers and minimal overlap risk with other skills.

5 / 5

Total

16

/

20

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

metadata_version

'metadata.version' is missing

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository
IJHack/QtPass
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.