Content
58%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is actionable with concrete CLI examples and clear sections, but it is held back by duplicated invocation boilerplate and a missing pre-delete validation/feedback loop for a destructive batch operation. Progressive disclosure is well-handled for a single-file skill.
Suggestions
Add an explicit pre-delete validation checkpoint (e.g., confirm paths exist and are non-empty, recommend running assets-find first and reviewing results before deletion).
Add a verify-after-delete feedback loop (re-run assets-find or check response.Errors and retry/report failures).
Consolidate the three 'How to Call' variants into one canonical example plus a brief pointer, and replace the 'string_value' placeholder with a realistic array input to reduce token cost and improve correctness.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient and assumes Claude's competence, but the input/output JSON Schema blocks and the duplicated 'How to Call' boilerplate (three near-identical invocation variants) add padding that could be tightened. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete, copy-paste ready CLI commands plus stdin/file variants and a troubleshooting note, with only minor gaps (the example uses a placeholder 'string_value' rather than a realistic array value). | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The destructive batch operation notes atomic deletion and surfaces errors, but there is no validation step before deleting and no verify/retry feedback loop, and the guideline caps destructive/batch skills without validation at 3. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized single-file skill with clear sections (Inputs, Behavior, How to Call, Input/Output schemas); no bundle files exist so all content is appropriately inline with minor organization gaps. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 14 / 20 Passed |