Content
65%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is highly actionable with concrete CLI examples and clear I/O schemas, but it repeats information and lacks a verification step for its destructive batch operation. Schema dumps inline rather than via progressive disclosure also reduce token efficiency.
Suggestions
Add a verification step (e.g., check `response.Errors` and confirm `response.DeletedPaths` before reporting success) to support the destructive batch operation.
Deduplicate the `paths` input description and move the full input/output JSON schemas into reference files linked from the body to improve conciseness and progressive disclosure.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The opening line repeats the frontmatter description, and the `paths` input is described three times (narrative, table, and JSON schema), which is efficient but could be tightened. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Concrete, copy-paste-ready `unity-mcp-cli run-tool assets-delete` bash examples with stdin and input-file variants are fully executable, matching the level-3 anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The find→delete→refresh sequence is implied and the response fields are documented, but this destructive batch operation has no explicit validation/verification checkpoint, capping the score at 2. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Sections are clearly labeled and there is a cross-skill reference to /unity-initial-setup, but the bulky inline input/output JSON schema dumps are content that could live in separate reference files, so organization is only adequate. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 9 / 12 Passed |